Should four months with an editor be long enough?

So, my manuscript has been with an editor for almost four months now and I haven’t heard back. No rejection, but no request for a complete either. We know which one I’m hoping for, and we know which one I almost expect to receive…however, I’m still nervous about sending a follow-up. But, I know I’d rather have an answer sooner rather than later, regardless, so that I can plan how I’m going to proceed with submissions.

How long do you usually wait before you send a follow-up?

Like this post? Share it :)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Sphinn
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • BlinkList

3 Comments

  1. Heather R. said,

    November 11, 2005 @ 1:42 pm

    I believe so, Terescia. I think you should definitely email for the status. Then again, this is a SLOW business!

  2. Bernita said,

    December 7, 2005 @ 8:05 am

    If it’s over the usual return parameters indicated by them for turn around, then a polite e-mail should be no problem.

  3. Terescia said,

    January 11, 2006 @ 10:19 am

    It’s my understanding with this publisher that three months or so is the turnaround time. I need to get on the ball and send them a quick letter or email asking for the status. :-) Ugh. I hate the whole submission game.

RSS feed for comments on this post