<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harlequin word counts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teresciaharvey.com/blog/2006/02/13/harlequin-word-counts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teresciaharvey.com/blog/2006/02/13/harlequin-word-counts/</link>
	<description>Terescia's thoughts and such on writing romantic fiction for publication.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:12:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Erotic Reader &#187; Harlequin Blaze: Are they getting shorter?</title>
		<link>http://www.teresciaharvey.com/blog/2006/02/13/harlequin-word-counts/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>The Erotic Reader &#187; Harlequin Blaze: Are they getting shorter?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teresciaharvey.com/blog/2006/02/13/harlequin-word-counts/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] As mentioned in this blog post, Harlequin is changing the word count lengths for some of their lines, including Harlequin Blaze. Blaze used to ask that manuscripts be 70,000 to 75,000 words long (and the Blaze guidelines on the eHarlequin website still show this number). Does this mean our Blaze books are going to get shorter? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As mentioned in this blog post, Harlequin is changing the word count lengths for some of their lines, including Harlequin Blaze. Blaze used to ask that manuscripts be 70,000 to 75,000 words long (and the Blaze guidelines on the eHarlequin website still show this number). Does this mean our Blaze books are going to get shorter? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
